This page allows users to nominate a featured article for the main page. The time the featured article changes will depend on the number of nominations received, although the suggested time is one month per featured article.
The article must be a mainspace page. It cannot start with the Nitrome:, User:, Talk:, MediaWiki:, etc. namespaces. The nominated article also cannot be a disambiguation page.
To nominate a featured article, create a new subheading with a link to the page ===[[Like this]]===. Below the heading, add some reasons why you think the article should be featured. Click here to add a new nomination.
Below the nominator's reasons for the article to be featured, registered users can provide feedback based on the article's quality. Users can support the article's promotion to the featured status, oppose it, add a suggestion or comment. It is also suggested that nominators and other editors read through suggestions and help fix errors within the nominated article if necessary. As always, remember to sign your username with four tildes (~~~~) when participating in a discussion.
A week after the nomination, an admin will look over the article for any last errors that need to be fixed. If community consensus leans more in favour of the article being featured, {{FeaturedArticle}} should be updated to include the new featured article and the successful nomination archived.
A long article describing Cuboy, his past and present appearances, his multitude of appearances, and also has lots of pictures. Plus, it's about a Nitrome characters barely anyone knows about. This would probably interest a lot of people. --Talk to NU 23:45, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
Support - - As supporter. --Talk to NU 23:45, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
No more supports? --Talk to NU 18:00, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
Support - - I agree, it would be an interesting read for many Nitromians, especially with the upcoming release of profiles and comments on games. I like that every description of Cuboy has a picture to go along with it and that his history is extensive, going a long way back to the founding of Nitrome. -- Ayernam 22:47, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
Support - I honestly, truly thought this should have been featured a long time ago. Extremely complete and interesting to read. --LilonowHi•Edits 14:03, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
Support - Agree entirely. Wonderful overlooked page with key information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NTPYTO (talk•contribs)
Comment - may I delay putting this up by a day? Still have yet to finish the grammar and spelling check. SQhi•(talk)500 Mainspace Edits(finally!) 23:16, April 14, 2013 (UTC)
The article is well-written and is about an enemy that most people will not have heard about, as many Nitromians don't read the blog. I fixed the few errors in it, and think it would be a good featured article, although it is relatively short page.—The preceding SIGNED comment was added by Mithrandir (talk•contribs)
Support - As nominator.—The preceding SIGNED comment was added by Mithrandir (talk•contribs)
19:32, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
Support - - The article is an interesting read and includes references to the blog post to where the information was derived. -- Ayernam 19:42, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
Support - - As Ayernam said, an interesting read on something unused--Talk to NU 21:07, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
Support - - Yep, interesting read on the innermost secrets of Nitrome(kidding) SQhi•(talk)Diamond 01:54, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
Article explains a lot how Nitrome Touchy works, includes the various methods of obtaining the app, the problems with the app, Android compatibility, how to hook it up to your TV, changes Nitrome.com, etc.. In short, this article is absolutely massive and has a lot of information - even a reception section!
Support - As nominator. --Talk to NU 20:55, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
Support - I agree. Very well written article, with lots of information and facts that even the common Nitromian would not know about just by reading Nitrome's blog and the Nitrome Touchy website. -- Ayernam 21:01, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
Comment - Lengthy, which is nice, content is quite good. I do not think the "Completely playable" table should belong in the article, the writing is very opinion-oriented and doesn't belong on the Nitrome Touchy article. Robot Wants RSK 22:49, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
How is it very opinion oriented? I find the content is rather important, as it shows flaws in the hardware that Nitrome failed to point out that could affect the software. And isn't it important to point out what Nitrome Touchy games don't work properly on an Android device? Also, where else could the section go? --Talk to NU 13:37, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
How about instead of calling it completely playable, we talk about degree of compatibility issues. None, minor, major.SQhi•(talk)Wiki Planner 16:23, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
Degree of compatibility sounds good. -- Ayernam 19:09, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
An article that covers the various strategies surrounding the Bow and arrow, and its weaknesses. When nominating this, I wasn't really sure about nominating it, as it seems to only cover its attacking methods and its weaknesses - nothing else.
Support - As nominator. --Talk to NU 20:55, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
Support - I support this article being nominated, but first I had to fill in the appearance section, because a featured article cannot have empty sections. Otherwise, really detailed article, with lots of information and strategies in the game information section. -- Ayernam 21:23, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
Support - Though, it could use an extra picture, maybe a screenshot from the game of a soldier wielding a bow? Robot Wants RSK 22:50, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
Support - As nominator. --Talk to NU 20:55, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
Support - This is a great article! I especially like the evolution template, because it really shows how the snot has evolved from its simplest to most complex forms. Also, lots of description in all sections. I also made two of the images transparent, so now they are all transparent. -- Ayernam 21:23, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
Support - This one has a good abundance of pictures to balance out the text. What about adding a screenshot from Snot Put of the background with snot? Robot Wants RSK 23:02, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
I added the pictures of snot from the backgrounds of Snot Put and Super Snot Put. -- Ayernam 19:52, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
Support - Shall we feature this for May? It seems the most ready to be featured. SQhi•(talk)Wiki Planner 15:59, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
Nominations that do not meet the above criteria should be closed immediately by an admin and archived. Other nominations where the community consensus leans towards delisting from the "Current nominations" section after a week of discussion should be closed and moved to the same page.